<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Decide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/you-decide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/you-decide/</link>
	<description>falling indelibly into the past</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Francois Lachance</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/you-decide/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Francois Lachance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=78#comment-179</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That is not a disjunctive conjunction in 2b, correct? It&#8217;s both the dresses and novels mentioned together that creates the unseemingliness, n&#8217;est-ce pas, not one or the other?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
If going by the reasoning set forth before (see quotatin below) and that reasoning still holds, I am willing to wager that the blogger of planned obsolescence chose option 3. 
&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;
04.09.06
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/index.php?/weblog/comments/894/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/index.php?/weblog/comments/894/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I feel somewhat bad for having done this.&#160; Probably I should just have deleted my email address, and not killed the account altogether.&#160; But I’m beginning to think that her continuing email confusion is on some level intentional.&#160; Who gets their own email address wrong, repeatedly, over such a protracted period of time? 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Part of me, too, keeps having these moments of regret about foiling my own opportunities for watching this girl’s story unfold, for being, in a deeply voyeuristic way, well beyond that of the regular reader of any online diary, somehow party to the tale. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
And then I think of the spam that this kid could no doubt generate for me, not to mention the general obnoxiousness of lurking in her various accounts, and figure that we&#8217;re all better off this way.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is not a disjunctive conjunction in 2b, correct? It&#8217;s both the dresses and novels mentioned together that creates the unseemingliness, n&#8217;est-ce pas, not one or the other?
</p>
<p>
If going by the reasoning set forth before (see quotatin below) and that reasoning still holds, I am willing to wager that the blogger of planned obsolescence chose option 3.
</p>
<p>
04.09.06
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/index.php?/weblog/comments/894/" rel="nofollow">http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/index.php?/weblog/comments/894/</a>
</p>
<p>
I feel somewhat bad for having done this.&nbsp; Probably I should just have deleted my email address, and not killed the account altogether.&nbsp; But I’m beginning to think that her continuing email confusion is on some level intentional.&nbsp; Who gets their own email address wrong, repeatedly, over such a protracted period of time?
</p>
<p>
Part of me, too, keeps having these moments of regret about foiling my own opportunities for watching this girl’s story unfold, for being, in a deeply voyeuristic way, well beyond that of the regular reader of any online diary, somehow party to the tale.
</p>
<p>
And then I think of the spam that this kid could no doubt generate for me, not to mention the general obnoxiousness of lurking in her various accounts, and figure that we&#8217;re all better off this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/you-decide/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=78#comment-178</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;2a is what I would probably do. But maybe a little of 2b, while you&#8217;re there.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2a is what I would probably do. But maybe a little of 2b, while you&#8217;re there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/you-decide/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 03:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=78#comment-177</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I vote for 2b, not only is it fun; but it can also serve as a form of escapism/anxiety reducer.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for 2b, not only is it fun; but it can also serve as a form of escapism/anxiety reducer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dafina girl</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/you-decide/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>dafina girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 05:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=78#comment-176</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I vote for 1 and wish to note under 2b that Anne of Green Gables is, ahem, Canadian and therefore sacrosanct.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for 1 and wish to note under 2b that Anne of Green Gables is, ahem, Canadian and therefore sacrosanct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profgrrrrl</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/you-decide/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>profgrrrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 04:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=78#comment-175</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;2b sounds kinda fun to me ...
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2b sounds kinda fun to me &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liz</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/you-decide/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 01:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=78#comment-174</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Eh, I&#8217;d just email the tagged folks and let them take care of it.&#160; Or do you have her actual email address?&#160; Have you tried emailing her with a cease-and-desist?&#160; I gotta say, this is SO WEIRD.&#160; I mean, it&#8217;s not like email addresses are hard to come by.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, I&#8217;d just email the tagged folks and let them take care of it.&nbsp; Or do you have her actual email address?&nbsp; Have you tried emailing her with a cease-and-desist?&nbsp; I gotta say, this is SO WEIRD.&nbsp; I mean, it&#8217;s not like email addresses are hard to come by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
