<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Silence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/the-silence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/the-silence/</link>
	<description>falling indelibly into the past</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Francois Lachance</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/the-silence/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Francois Lachance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 20:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=218#comment-440</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There seem to be two quandries described in the blog entry. Perhaps they need to be decoupled. One is what to write for the blog. The other how to use writing to work through some self-exploration. Could a series of formal exercises by the solution to the what to blog question? E.g. minimum number of sentences on one of the primary colours (red, blue, yellow) for three days in succession? Or some such combination of entry length, theme or object, and cycle length (e.g. number of consecutive days, number of times per week). And could such a formalist approach be used in the more private writing/witnessing spaces for further self exploration. Variations on telling it slant.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There seem to be two quandries described in the blog entry. Perhaps they need to be decoupled. One is what to write for the blog. The other how to use writing to work through some self-exploration. Could a series of formal exercises by the solution to the what to blog question? E.g. minimum number of sentences on one of the primary colours (red, blue, yellow) for three days in succession? Or some such combination of entry length, theme or object, and cycle length (e.g. number of consecutive days, number of times per week). And could such a formalist approach be used in the more private writing/witnessing spaces for further self exploration. Variations on telling it slant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meg</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/the-silence/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=218#comment-439</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Same here, all around.&#160; Except that for me it&#8217;s not thought processes and emotional baggage but various peeves with various situations (or is a peeve an item of emotional luggage?).&#160; And given my recent (somewhat coerced) de-quasi-anonymization, I feel you all the more.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here, all around.&nbsp; Except that for me it&#8217;s not thought processes and emotional baggage but various peeves with various situations (or is a peeve an item of emotional luggage?).&nbsp; And given my recent (somewhat coerced) de-quasi-anonymization, I feel you all the more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/the-silence/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=218#comment-438</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#8217;ve thought about it, but I&#8217;ve barely got the energy at times to keep up this blog, much less anything else.&#160; Plus, I&#8217;m quite convinced that I would&#8212;immediately after posting something potentially very embarassing or incriminating, were anyone to know who I was&#8212;make some goof either here or there that revealed my super-secret identity to all!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I&#8217;ve always marveled at folks who can really and truly maintain something like anonymity or pseudonymity online, and even more at folks who maintain both nymous and pseudonymous presences on the web.&#160; I&#8217;m quite sure I&#8217;d mess it up in a matter of days.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve thought about it, but I&#8217;ve barely got the energy at times to keep up this blog, much less anything else.&nbsp; Plus, I&#8217;m quite convinced that I would&#8212;immediately after posting something potentially very embarassing or incriminating, were anyone to know who I was&#8212;make some goof either here or there that revealed my super-secret identity to all!
</p>
<p>
I&#8217;ve always marveled at folks who can really and truly maintain something like anonymity or pseudonymity online, and even more at folks who maintain both nymous and pseudonymous presences on the web.&nbsp; I&#8217;m quite sure I&#8217;d mess it up in a matter of days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/the-silence/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 06:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=218#comment-437</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You should consider an anonymous blogger blog.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should consider an anonymous blogger blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
