http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/stats-watching/ falling indelibly into the past Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:32:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/stats-watching/#comment-932 Scott Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:20:02 +0000 http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=452#comment-932 <p>I was googling for Taibbi last week. That might just be me. </p> I was googling for Taibbi last week. That might just be me.

]]> http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/stats-watching/#comment-931 incline Sat, 16 Jul 2005 05:08:38 +0000 http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=452#comment-931 <p>wow, what a good-looking graph!!  yeah.  the academic blog thing freaked me out.  inspired me to go write an entry about my grad advisor. </p> wow, what a good-looking graph!!  yeah.  the academic blog thing freaked me out.  inspired me to go write an entry about my grad advisor.

]]> http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/stats-watching/#comment-930 KF Thu, 14 Jul 2005 20:11:22 +0000 http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=452#comment-930 <p>Absolutely.  You know what happens when the crappy Nielsen ratings of an otherwise cool TV show get published, right?  Other folks see those numbers and think, “wow, no one’s watching, must not be any good.” So yes, relative scale, but no numbers.  I need to maintain the illusion that I’m popular. </p> Absolutely.  You know what happens when the crappy Nielsen ratings of an otherwise cool TV show get published, right?  Other folks see those numbers and think, “wow, no one’s watching, must not be any good.” So yes, relative scale, but no numbers.  I need to maintain the illusion that I’m popular.

]]> http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/stats-watching/#comment-929 Jake Thu, 14 Jul 2005 19:48:58 +0000 http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=452#comment-929 <p>Relative scale, but no objective measure of how many readers you have--sneaky. I won’t tell you mine, either! </p> Relative scale, but no objective measure of how many readers you have–sneaky. I won’t tell you mine, either!

]]>