<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Inside</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/search-inside/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/search-inside/</link>
	<description>falling indelibly into the past</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/search-inside/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=153#comment-314</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, studies* have shown that making the text available online generally results in increased rather than decreased sales, as folks get drawn in by what they can find and then decide they&#8217;d rather read it in print.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As to your question:&#160; My basic sense is that more is nearly always better, particularly if they&#8217;re good journals.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
*Don&#8217;t ask me to cite these studies.&#160; I read that somewhere and I can&#8217;t for the life of me remember where.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, studies* have shown that making the text available online generally results in increased rather than decreased sales, as folks get drawn in by what they can find and then decide they&#8217;d rather read it in print.
</p>
<p>
As to your question:&nbsp; My basic sense is that more is nearly always better, particularly if they&#8217;re good journals.
</p>
</p>
<p>
*Don&#8217;t ask me to cite these studies.&nbsp; I read that somewhere and I can&#8217;t for the life of me remember where.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e. fiction</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/search-inside/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>e. fiction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=153#comment-313</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Of course, this might mean a few less copies sold, since poor schlubs like me* have been known to use the search feature to read a book three pages at a time rather than buy it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Quick professional question: do you think having three publications (articles in decent journals) is any better on the job market than having two?&#160; I&#8217;m trying to decide how to respond to a revise-and-resubmit request.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
- - - -
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
* - Although in this instance, I&#8217;ll be purchasing a copy, hopefully to be autographed by the author in December.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, this might mean a few less copies sold, since poor schlubs like me* have been known to use the search feature to read a book three pages at a time rather than buy it.
</p>
<p>
Quick professional question: do you think having three publications (articles in decent journals) is any better on the job market than having two?&nbsp; I&#8217;m trying to decide how to respond to a revise-and-resubmit request.
</p>
<p>
- - - -
</p>
<p>
* - Although in this instance, I&#8217;ll be purchasing a copy, hopefully to be autographed by the author in December.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Mittell</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/search-inside/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Mittell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=153#comment-312</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice searchability - the even cooler thing that Amazon does with some books (unknown what criteria) is publish Concordance lists of the 100 most commonly used terms in the book.&#160; My book has that feature (for the hardcover only for some reason) at &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/sitb-next/0415969026/ref=sbx_con/104-8907841-1497528?ie=UTF8#concordance" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/sitb-next/0415969026/ref=sbx_con/104-8907841-1497528?ie=UTF8#concordance&lt;/a&gt; - it creates kind-of a new interface to the old medium of the book.&#160; And looks cool too&#8230;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice searchability - the even cooler thing that Amazon does with some books (unknown what criteria) is publish Concordance lists of the 100 most commonly used terms in the book.&nbsp; My book has that feature (for the hardcover only for some reason) at <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/sitb-next/0415969026/ref=sbx_con/104-8907841-1497528?ie=UTF8#concordance" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/sitb-next/0415969026/ref=sbx_con/104-8907841-1497528?ie=UTF8#concordance</a> - it creates kind-of a new interface to the old medium of the book.&nbsp; And looks cool too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
