<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fall Break</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/fall-break/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/fall-break/</link>
	<description>falling indelibly into the past</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Planned Obsolescence &#187; Blog Archive &#187; At the Blogging Crossroads</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/fall-break/#comment-3668</link>
		<dc:creator>Planned Obsolescence &#187; Blog Archive &#187; At the Blogging Crossroads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=964#comment-3668</guid>
		<description>[...] curious why. Perhaps it&#8217;s no more than a cyclical thing &#8212; it&#8217;s no accident that five years ago today I was thinking about much the same problem &#8212; feeling unable to come up with much interesting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] curious why. Perhaps it&#8217;s no more than a cyclical thing &#8212; it&#8217;s no accident that five years ago today I was thinking about much the same problem &#8212; feeling unable to come up with much interesting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/fall-break/#comment-2308</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=964#comment-2308</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, BT, as always; your comments are much appreciated.&#160; I agree with you that some of the foibles of contemporary journalism can be traced back to Wolfe and Mailer and that tendency, in the so-called &#8220;new journalism,&#8221; to equate powerful writing (i.e., the use of the conventions of fiction within non-fictional material) with the promotion of the powerful ego.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I think the connection I&#8217;m seeking between the Problem with Ehrenreich and the Problem with &lt;i&gt;The West Wing&lt;/i&gt; may be something far more dangerous, and not at all literary/representational in nature:&#160; I think the issue may well be the general&#8212;pardon the metaphor&#8212;flaccidity of thinking on the left these days.&#160; After all the talk several years back (most of it in white circles, of course) about the vacuum of leadership in the African American community, I think the more pressing (and often unacknowledged) problem is the vacuum of national leadership on the left.&#160; Who are we to imagine leading the charge for progressive reform, whether politically&#8212;Al Gore? Tom Daschle? Gray Davis?&#8212;or, for that matter, culturally&#8212;Michael Moore? Barbara Ehrenreich? Barbara Streisand?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I think my disheartenment (okay, I know, but is there an appropriate actually existing noun?) stems from finding two potentially radical moments of political engagement in U.S. culture watered down by their authors&#8217; self-congratulatory assumption that they&#8217;ve already got &#8220;right&#8221; on their side, and thus don&#8217;t need to do anything more.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But now, of course, I&#8217;m re-heartened by trying to picture Ari Fleischer in a cropped t-shirt, maybe with a little belly-button ring&#8230;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, BT, as always; your comments are much appreciated.&nbsp; I agree with you that some of the foibles of contemporary journalism can be traced back to Wolfe and Mailer and that tendency, in the so-called &#8220;new journalism,&#8221; to equate powerful writing (i.e., the use of the conventions of fiction within non-fictional material) with the promotion of the powerful ego.
</p>
<p>
I think the connection I&#8217;m seeking between the Problem with Ehrenreich and the Problem with <i>The West Wing</i> may be something far more dangerous, and not at all literary/representational in nature:&nbsp; I think the issue may well be the general&#8212;pardon the metaphor&#8212;flaccidity of thinking on the left these days.&nbsp; After all the talk several years back (most of it in white circles, of course) about the vacuum of leadership in the African American community, I think the more pressing (and often unacknowledged) problem is the vacuum of national leadership on the left.&nbsp; Who are we to imagine leading the charge for progressive reform, whether politically&#8212;Al Gore? Tom Daschle? Gray Davis?&#8212;or, for that matter, culturally&#8212;Michael Moore? Barbara Ehrenreich? Barbara Streisand?
</p>
<p>
I think my disheartenment (okay, I know, but is there an appropriate actually existing noun?) stems from finding two potentially radical moments of political engagement in U.S. culture watered down by their authors&#8217; self-congratulatory assumption that they&#8217;ve already got &#8220;right&#8221; on their side, and thus don&#8217;t need to do anything more.
</p>
<p>
But now, of course, I&#8217;m re-heartened by trying to picture Ari Fleischer in a cropped t-shirt, maybe with a little belly-button ring&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BT</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/fall-break/#comment-2307</link>
		<dc:creator>BT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2002 21:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=964#comment-2307</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey KF&#8212;worry not over the lag time between posts.&#160; P.O. is all about the quality, baby!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Re Barbara Ehrenreich: my defense of her project notwithstanding, you are 100% right about the way the post-Tom Wolfe/Norman Mailer mode of journalism seems perpetually doomed to getting in the way of its own reason for being.&#160; Even when the story is a good one, even when it&#8217;s well told, it&#8217;s more and more the case that, as you say, the narrator gets top billing, and his/her noodlings drown out all else.&#160; And, as I said, I imagine the stage version you described as being an A-1 bad idea.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
You&#8217;re also right about the West Wing, which entered serious senesence (sp?) a couple of weeks ago, when CJ was shown MCing some repellent Rock the Vote party at a House of Blues&#8212;they had her wearing a short t-shirt, fashionably showing bellybutton.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Now, I&#8217;m the last person to ask Allison Janney to cover up her midriff, but the PRESS SECRETARY OF THE WHITE HOUSE does not show belly.&#160; Not in this universe, not yet.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It was a small thing&#8212;and all the faults you&#8217;ve named, Kathleen, are much more damning.&#160; But for me it was a sign that all quality control has been lost.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey KF&#8212;worry not over the lag time between posts.&nbsp; P.O. is all about the quality, baby!
</p>
<p>
Re Barbara Ehrenreich: my defense of her project notwithstanding, you are 100% right about the way the post-Tom Wolfe/Norman Mailer mode of journalism seems perpetually doomed to getting in the way of its own reason for being.&nbsp; Even when the story is a good one, even when it&#8217;s well told, it&#8217;s more and more the case that, as you say, the narrator gets top billing, and his/her noodlings drown out all else.&nbsp; And, as I said, I imagine the stage version you described as being an A-1 bad idea.
</p>
<p>
You&#8217;re also right about the West Wing, which entered serious senesence (sp?) a couple of weeks ago, when CJ was shown MCing some repellent Rock the Vote party at a House of Blues&#8212;they had her wearing a short t-shirt, fashionably showing bellybutton.
</p>
<p>
Now, I&#8217;m the last person to ask Allison Janney to cover up her midriff, but the PRESS SECRETARY OF THE WHITE HOUSE does not show belly.&nbsp; Not in this universe, not yet.
</p>
<p>
It was a small thing&#8212;and all the faults you&#8217;ve named, Kathleen, are much more damning.&nbsp; But for me it was a sign that all quality control has been lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
