<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Androids Dream of the Key to the Executive Washroom?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/do-androids-dream-of-the-key-to-the-executive-washroom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/do-androids-dream-of-the-key-to-the-executive-washroom/</link>
	<description>falling indelibly into the past</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Francois Lachance</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/do-androids-dream-of-the-key-to-the-executive-washroom/#comment-2285</link>
		<dc:creator>Francois Lachance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=949#comment-2285</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;And what other fictional worlds take on a different character or flavour when presented in audio format? I wonder if the same occurs with Wuthering Heights.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what other fictional worlds take on a different character or flavour when presented in audio format? I wonder if the same occurs with Wuthering Heights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/do-androids-dream-of-the-key-to-the-executive-washroom/#comment-2284</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2003 06:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=949#comment-2284</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No, you&#8217;re absolutely right.&#160; And that&#8217;s what I meant, though I apparently left out the key bits of logical connection:&#160; I prefer the director&#8217;s cut, precisely because I hated the voiceover and the artificially-added happy ending of the original release.&#160; The director&#8217;s cut also adds the great bit of weirdness with the unicorn&#8212;that one dream-like memory and then the origami unicorn Edward James Olmos leaves him near the end of the film&#8212;both just cryptic and lovely.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you&#8217;re absolutely right.&nbsp; And that&#8217;s what I meant, though I apparently left out the key bits of logical connection:&nbsp; I prefer the director&#8217;s cut, precisely because I hated the voiceover and the artificially-added happy ending of the original release.&nbsp; The director&#8217;s cut also adds the great bit of weirdness with the unicorn&#8212;that one dream-like memory and then the origami unicorn Edward James Olmos leaves him near the end of the film&#8212;both just cryptic and lovely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/do-androids-dream-of-the-key-to-the-executive-washroom/#comment-2283</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2003 02:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=949#comment-2283</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I thought the director&#8217;s cut removed the voiceover and ended before the &#8220;ride to freedom&#8221; - as they were still exiting the apartment.&#160; In this one, of course, the notion that Deckard is also a replicant is raised rather clearly and I like that element.&#160; Plus the &#8220;dream&#8221; stuff seems to me to make more sense.&#160; I find this one more dark, more compelling in its fuzziness, and somehow better acted.&#160; When the same scenes play with the voiceover, it&#8217;s overkill somehow.&#160; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
At the same time, I like the voiceover with its explicit ties to the genre on one hand and laugh at it on the other.&#160; Nonetheless, isn&#8217;t the voiceover the one that was originally released, with the voiceover there at the studio&#8217;s insistence?&#160; I thought he removed it for the director&#8217;s cut.&#160; Or am I getting it backward?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the director&#8217;s cut removed the voiceover and ended before the &#8220;ride to freedom&#8221; - as they were still exiting the apartment.&nbsp; In this one, of course, the notion that Deckard is also a replicant is raised rather clearly and I like that element.&nbsp; Plus the &#8220;dream&#8221; stuff seems to me to make more sense.&nbsp; I find this one more dark, more compelling in its fuzziness, and somehow better acted.&nbsp; When the same scenes play with the voiceover, it&#8217;s overkill somehow.&nbsp;
</p>
<p>
At the same time, I like the voiceover with its explicit ties to the genre on one hand and laugh at it on the other.&nbsp; Nonetheless, isn&#8217;t the voiceover the one that was originally released, with the voiceover there at the studio&#8217;s insistence?&nbsp; I thought he removed it for the director&#8217;s cut.&nbsp; Or am I getting it backward?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/do-androids-dream-of-the-key-to-the-executive-washroom/#comment-2282</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=949#comment-2282</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Me?&#160; Director&#8217;s cut.&#160; Most definitely.&#160; Something about Deckard and Rachel driving off into that glorious airbrushed future in the original release gives me hives.&#160; Or maybe it&#8217;s the voiceover, relentlessly explaining everything to its idiot audience.&#160; Give me puzzling and dark any day.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
And you?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me?&nbsp; Director&#8217;s cut.&nbsp; Most definitely.&nbsp; Something about Deckard and Rachel driving off into that glorious airbrushed future in the original release gives me hives.&nbsp; Or maybe it&#8217;s the voiceover, relentlessly explaining everything to its idiot audience.&nbsp; Give me puzzling and dark any day.
</p>
<p>
And you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/do-androids-dream-of-the-key-to-the-executive-washroom/#comment-2281</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=949#comment-2281</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I haven&#8217;t read the book myself, but have seen the film(s) a number of times.&#160; I fear we&#8217;ve discussed this before, but I&#8217;ll go ahead and ask again: which version do you prefer?&#160; I&#8217;m always interested to hear where people stand on the varying cuts.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read the book myself, but have seen the film(s) a number of times.&nbsp; I fear we&#8217;ve discussed this before, but I&#8217;ll go ahead and ask again: which version do you prefer?&nbsp; I&#8217;m always interested to hear where people stand on the varying cuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
