<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Completion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/completion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/completion/</link>
	<description>falling indelibly into the past</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ChrisE</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/completion/#comment-3563</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 05:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/completion/#comment-3563</guid>
		<description>Of course, coupled with a free &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaTeX" rel="nofollow"&gt;LaTeX&lt;/a&gt; installation, and a little time to figure things out, it is an UNBEATABLE word processing combination. Power, quality, aesthetics, efficiency, lightness ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, coupled with a free <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaTeX" rel="nofollow">LaTeX</a> installation, and a little time to figure things out, it is an UNBEATABLE word processing combination. Power, quality, aesthetics, efficiency, lightness &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/completion/#comment-3156</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/completion/#comment-3156</guid>
		<description>Perhaps.  It's just a text editor, though, which I use for note-taking -- I had been using Word (with the kinds of fancy auto-correct features that Meg mention), but I frankly got tired of my notes files becoming so weighty because Word was freighting them with a lot of unnecessary data, when all I wanted was the content.  (Which is to say, I didn't need formatting, page layout, etc; all I needed was the text.)  My text-only notes files are much, much lighter weight, much more easily transportable, etc.  But they're just text -- there's little to no formatting involved in them.  If your husband is looking for a program to take notes in, something like TextMate might be good, but it can't, unfortunately, replace a full-fledged wordprocessor...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps.  It&#8217;s just a text editor, though, which I use for note-taking &#8212; I had been using Word (with the kinds of fancy auto-correct features that Meg mention), but I frankly got tired of my notes files becoming so weighty because Word was freighting them with a lot of unnecessary data, when all I wanted was the content.  (Which is to say, I didn&#8217;t need formatting, page layout, etc; all I needed was the text.)  My text-only notes files are much, much lighter weight, much more easily transportable, etc.  But they&#8217;re just text &#8212; there&#8217;s little to no formatting involved in them.  If your husband is looking for a program to take notes in, something like TextMate might be good, but it can&#8217;t, unfortunately, replace a full-fledged wordprocessor&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bitsy parker</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/completion/#comment-3150</link>
		<dc:creator>bitsy parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/completion/#comment-3150</guid>
		<description>My husband is an English professor, writer of academic papers and books, and a detester of technology. Seems like TextMate would be just the thing for him.  Is TextMate friendly enough for a person who uses nothing more elaborate than Word?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My husband is an English professor, writer of academic papers and books, and a detester of technology. Seems like TextMate would be just the thing for him.  Is TextMate friendly enough for a person who uses nothing more elaborate than Word?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meg</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/completion/#comment-3134</link>
		<dc:creator>meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/completion/#comment-3134</guid>
		<description>Most medievalists I know use the AutoCorrect feature of Word (yeah, I know) as a sort of completion feature.  It's pretty handy to type "xlatn" and get "translation," "CdT" and get "Crêtrien de Troyes," etc.

Back in OS 9, I had a freeware program called Text-something that did this is all applications, but I'm not aware of an OSX equivalent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most medievalists I know use the AutoCorrect feature of Word (yeah, I know) as a sort of completion feature.  It&#8217;s pretty handy to type &#8220;xlatn&#8221; and get &#8220;translation,&#8221; &#8220;CdT&#8221; and get &#8220;Crêtrien de Troyes,&#8221; etc.</p>
<p>Back in OS 9, I had a freeware program called Text-something that did this is all applications, but I&#8217;m not aware of an OSX equivalent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
