<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: As a Demonstration of How Much Work I&#8217;ve Gotten Done Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/as-a-demonstration-of-how-much-work-ive-gotten-done-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/as-a-demonstration-of-how-much-work-ive-gotten-done-today/</link>
	<description>falling indelibly into the past</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: meg</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/as-a-demonstration-of-how-much-work-ive-gotten-done-today/#comment-1286</link>
		<dc:creator>meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=574#comment-1286</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I keep three or four browsers up at all times.&#160; iCab because of its awesome special features&#8212;argument-passing to search engines, super-dooper form-filling abilities, etc.&#160; Camino because I like the look and feel.&#160; Safari because that&#8217;s what my campus portal likes.&#160; And sometimes Firefox for ornery webpages.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep three or four browsers up at all times.&nbsp; iCab because of its awesome special features&#8212;argument-passing to search engines, super-dooper form-filling abilities, etc.&nbsp; Camino because I like the look and feel.&nbsp; Safari because that&#8217;s what my campus portal likes.&nbsp; And sometimes Firefox for ornery webpages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/as-a-demonstration-of-how-much-work-ive-gotten-done-today/#comment-1285</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=574#comment-1285</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm.&#160; Partly because Firefox seems to have some slight speed-advantages and greater flexibility in terms of extensions.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Partly due to the kind of software experimentation I inevitably do when I have a big project in front of me and am procrastinating in order not to face the terror of not quite knowing where to begin.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
:)
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.&nbsp; Partly because Firefox seems to have some slight speed-advantages and greater flexibility in terms of extensions.
</p>
<p>
Partly due to the kind of software experimentation I inevitably do when I have a big project in front of me and am procrastinating in order not to face the terror of not quite knowing where to begin.
</p>
<p>
:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/as-a-demonstration-of-how-much-work-ive-gotten-done-today/#comment-1284</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=574#comment-1284</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So why are you thinking about switching? 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
FWIW, I switched from Safari to Firefox about 6 months ago, mainly because I was getting tired of manually refreshing the gmail interface. But aside from minor feature differences, I&#8217;ve always considered Safari and Firefox to be roughly equivalent. (except: oh yeah, rss feeds in Firefox, that&#8217;s a big difference...)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Just curious is all.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why are you thinking about switching?
</p>
<p>
FWIW, I switched from Safari to Firefox about 6 months ago, mainly because I was getting tired of manually refreshing the gmail interface. But aside from minor feature differences, I&#8217;ve always considered Safari and Firefox to be roughly equivalent. (except: oh yeah, rss feeds in Firefox, that&#8217;s a big difference&#8230;)
</p>
<p>
Just curious is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/as-a-demonstration-of-how-much-work-ive-gotten-done-today/#comment-1283</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=574#comment-1283</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I managed to get it fixed before I went to bed last night, but figured I&#8217;d left myself enough comments.&#160; :)
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I managed to get it fixed before I went to bed last night, but figured I&#8217;d left myself enough comments.&nbsp; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G Zombie</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/as-a-demonstration-of-how-much-work-ive-gotten-done-today/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>G Zombie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 03:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=574#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Your site looks fine to me in both Safari and Firefox on my machine: OS X.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
*shrug*
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your site looks fine to me in both Safari and Firefox on my machine: OS X.
</p>
<p>
*shrug*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/as-a-demonstration-of-how-much-work-ive-gotten-done-today/#comment-1281</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 01:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=574#comment-1281</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dammit.&#160; Now it&#8217;s broken in Safari&#8230;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dammit.&nbsp; Now it&#8217;s broken in Safari&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/as-a-demonstration-of-how-much-work-ive-gotten-done-today/#comment-1280</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 01:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=574#comment-1280</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Okay.&#160; Got rid of the wrapper div.&#160; Took the float that had been in the wrapper css and moved it to the blogtitle.&#160; Took the clear:both from the blogtitle and moved it to the menubar.&#160; Got rid of the spacer.&#160; Everything works now, though I had to get rid of the 1px white border around the blogtitle in order to do this.&#160; (The 10px red top border had been contained in the wrapper; to move that to the blogtitle, I had to get rid of the 1px white top border that had been there, and so I got rid of the 1px white top border in the menubar, too.)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
More info than anyone but me needs, but I want to remember what I did....
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay.&nbsp; Got rid of the wrapper div.&nbsp; Took the float that had been in the wrapper css and moved it to the blogtitle.&nbsp; Took the clear:both from the blogtitle and moved it to the menubar.&nbsp; Got rid of the spacer.&nbsp; Everything works now, though I had to get rid of the 1px white border around the blogtitle in order to do this.&nbsp; (The 10px red top border had been contained in the wrapper; to move that to the blogtitle, I had to get rid of the 1px white top border that had been there, and so I got rid of the 1px white top border in the menubar, too.)
</p>
<p>
More info than anyone but me needs, but I want to remember what I did&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/as-a-demonstration-of-how-much-work-ive-gotten-done-today/#comment-1279</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 01:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=574#comment-1279</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I forgot to note that I&#8217;m also puzzled about the image-size issue you mention&#8212;I&#8217;m actually not sizing the image anywhere in the CSS or HTML.&#160; The image opens for me in another window as the same size it shows in the banner....
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to note that I&#8217;m also puzzled about the image-size issue you mention&#8212;I&#8217;m actually not sizing the image anywhere in the CSS or HTML.&nbsp; The image opens for me in another window as the same size it shows in the banner&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/as-a-demonstration-of-how-much-work-ive-gotten-done-today/#comment-1278</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 00:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=574#comment-1278</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You know, I seriously thought about just emailing you directly, Liz&#8212;I knew that if anybody had the knowledge/patience to come up with an answer, it&#8217;d be you!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Of course, I began the whole process by checking the validation&#8212;the missing quotes around &#8220;right&#8221; were an error created today as I tinkered.&#160; Thanks for catching that.&#160; And I&#8217;m darned curious how I ended up with two calls to the CSS.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But I&#8217;m not yet getting the results that you are by removing the wrapper div.&#160; I&#8217;m going to have to tinker some more, I think.&#160; Fortunately, it&#8217;s now late enough that I won&#8217;t feel guilty about it!
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I seriously thought about just emailing you directly, Liz&#8212;I knew that if anybody had the knowledge/patience to come up with an answer, it&#8217;d be you!
</p>
<p>
Of course, I began the whole process by checking the validation&#8212;the missing quotes around &#8220;right&#8221; were an error created today as I tinkered.&nbsp; Thanks for catching that.&nbsp; And I&#8217;m darned curious how I ended up with two calls to the CSS.
</p>
<p>
But I&#8217;m not yet getting the results that you are by removing the wrapper div.&nbsp; I&#8217;m going to have to tinker some more, I think.&nbsp; Fortunately, it&#8217;s now late enough that I won&#8217;t feel guilty about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Lawley</title>
		<link>http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/as-a-demonstration-of-how-much-work-ive-gotten-done-today/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Lawley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 23:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=574#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How could I resist?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
So, first of all, you need to fix the missing quotes on your image (align=right should be align="right") so that everything validates. Then you need to delete one of your two calls to your css, since you&#8217;re duplicating all the information by having both a linked and an imported CSS file. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Finally, I was able to fix the display by removing the wrapper div entirely. The only problem is that it then shows the entire image, rather than cropping it--that&#8217;s easy enough to fix if you simply use an image that&#8217;s already the size you want.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could I resist?
</p>
<p>
So, first of all, you need to fix the missing quotes on your image (align=right should be align=&#8221;right&#8221;) so that everything validates. Then you need to delete one of your two calls to your css, since you&#8217;re duplicating all the information by having both a linked and an imported CSS file.
</p>
<p>
Finally, I was able to fix the display by removing the wrapper div entirely. The only problem is that it then shows the entire image, rather than cropping it&#8211;that&#8217;s easy enough to fix if you simply use an image that&#8217;s already the size you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
