Comments on: Ahem. http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/ahem/ falling indelibly into the past Sun, 20 Jul 2008 03:17:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: KF http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/ahem/#comment-1839 KF Tue, 09 Dec 2003 06:31:17 +0000 http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=806#comment-1839 <p>You’re absolutely right that it ought to be USC.  But being an LSU alum in SoCal is complex enough already.  (Actually, I begin to think that the whammy I asked my friends in NOLA to put on USC may have been a little more effective than I intended.) </p> <p> Oh, and P.S.:  That’s G-E-A-U-X.  We clearly need to larn you to spell some Louisiana, son. </p> You’re absolutely right that it ought to be USC.  But being an LSU alum in SoCal is complex enough already.  (Actually, I begin to think that the whammy I asked my friends in NOLA to put on USC may have been a little more effective than I intended.)

Oh, and P.S.:  That’s G-E-A-U-X.  We clearly need to larn you to spell some Louisiana, son.

]]> By: chuck http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/ahem/#comment-1838 chuck Tue, 09 Dec 2003 04:54:32 +0000 http://www.new.plannedobsolescence.net/?p=806#comment-1838 <p>USC ought to be there instead of the Sooners, but no matter what: Go Tigers!  </p> <p> I’m pretty excited about Purdue making the Capital One, where they get a rematch against UGA… </p> USC ought to be there instead of the Sooners, but no matter what: Go Tigers! 

I’m pretty excited about Purdue making the Capital One, where they get a rematch against UGA…

]]>